Welcome Guest Login | Register | Site Map | | Make TelecomTiger my homepage     
Telecom News
Enterprise |  Policy & Regulation |  Mobiles & Tabs |  Corporate |  VAS |  People Movement  |  Technology  |  LTE
Policy & Regulation
Chinese vendors face virtual ban in future tenders of BSNL
TT Correspondent |  New Delhi |  20 May 2009

The controversy over selection of Chinese vendor Huawei for BSNL''s mega-GSM tender in the southern region, appears to backfire on the Chinese companies as the DoT has advised BSNL to refrain from the use of equipment supplied by Chinese companies in future contracts.

 

“In view of the pronounced security concerns in respect of Chinese vendors, procurement of resources from these vendors, particularly in sensitive regions would not be in the interest of national security. “Therefore, resources should not be procured from Chinese vendors for deployment in sensitive regions. The sensitive regions are defined as States having international border with China, Bangladesh, Myanmar and Pakistan,” said a DoT communication to BSNL.

 

This implies that the DoT has virtually directed BSNL not to consider Chinese telecom gear except for in the South.

 

Meanwhile for the current tender, DoT wants BSNL to conduct security audit of its network for any possible spyware. DoT has told BSNL to furnish a self-certificate for carrying out the security audit.

 

Additionally BSNL has been directed to manage its network and not outsource it to any vendor or third party. BSNL is to take over such management services within two years. All BSNL networks should also be free from remote access capability, stated the DoT communication.

 

“BSNL should have a DoT approved network and disaster recovery management plan and capability. Such a plan or capability should be submitted to the licensor for approval,” added DoT.

 

All the measures stated by DoT indeed sound proactive measures to ensure country's larger interests. But then one wonders that with DoT itself having so many apprehensions over use of such equipments, why is the PSU operator going ahead with its selection instead of looking for other alternatives.

    
 mail this article    print this article    Show and Post comment
20 May 2009(IST)  
Comment
This is one of the important movement from DoT towards ensuring the national security this nation. Being penetrated into the 2G, 3G and Fixed wireless(WILL) networks, it is now very simple for the Chinese suppliers to get the desired calls / data to their 'interested parties'. Not only for the PSUs, but DOT should also intervene into the private sector procurment, since almost 70% of the wireless calls are being handled through their network. Be it PSU or private, government should ensure trasparency in the supplier selection, for the greater interest of the nation. No section of the network should be given to a single supplier and result in a monopolistic business atmosphere, posing risk on support front as well as restriction on access to new technologies. PSU need not search for cheeper suppliers & solutions, while risking the security of this nation, as India is not that poor to surrender its communication networks to someone who was always in our books of national security since Independence..!
Posted By :- Paul
Comment
Many thanks to DOT in taking steps to ensure National security. National security is ALWAYS first and BUSINESS later... We all INDIANS need to be responsible enough to ensure National Integrity first then consider High Integrity solutions.
Posted By :- Chakraborty
Comment
Private operators also should be subjected to same security guidelines.
Posted By :- Verma
Comment
The country's security interests are of paramount importance and should never be overlooked. At the same time , then why allow private operators to use Chinese equipments? I am sure the security concerns will still be there. Infact by not allowing BSNL to buy equipments from Chinese vendors, while allowing the private operators to do so, we are weakning BSNLs competetiveness and putting them to a disadvantage vis a vis the private players, as they will be forced to buy costlier equipments while the private operators will get away sourcing low priced products from Chinese manufacturers. So if we have to block the Chinese, it should apply to all as a matter of fair market practise.
Posted By :- Satendra Tewari
Comment
National Security should be the first concern but to doubt on every chinese company is not good. These are companies which are not limited to 1 or 2 countries. They have a large market including US and Europe. so it looks quite impractical that they will do something which will hamper their profits from other markets. To put a security audit can be accepted but to put ban should be reconsidered
Posted By :- Neel
Comment
We are not talking about buying and selling of toys..We are infact talking about "Critical National Telecom Infrastructure !! "There are every reasons to doubt ..looking back into the year 1962 of Indian history...and ups & downs in relations since then... Recently UK & US intelligence agencies have also raised serious concerns...
Posted By :- Chakraborty
Comment
If BSNL goes ahead with this contract to Huawei, I am going withdraw all my subscribership from BSNL. I want to protest by doing this.
Posted By :- Rajendran Rajan
Whitepaper
Maintain Business Continuity with Cisco ASR 9000 nV Technology
It is a virtual chassis solution where a pair of ASR 9000 routers acts as a single device by maintaining a single contr...read more
Simplify Your Network with Cisco ASR 9000 nV Technology
With the new Cisco Network Virtualization (nV) technology in the Cisco ASR 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers, se...read more
Cisco Small Cell Solution: Reduce Costs, Improve Coverage
It is designed to address the challenge of mobile service coverage and to expand network capacity...read more